If you're one of the investors who hold an investment property and an investment property that is not geared to your needs, There is a more tax-efficient method of structuring an investment loan. Until recently, there was a lot of confusion among property investors taxpayers on the deductibility of interest capitalized on the investment loans. In the past, the Australian Taxation Office has been offering clarifications on this issue for a while. There have been two recent developments that are providing some direction on the direction that the ATO has given regarding the deduction of compound interest or capitalized on investment loans or line of credit for investment.
Maurice Roussety First, there was a favorable Private Ruling to a taxpayer with the home loan and an investment credit line with one lender and an investment loan from another lender. This taxpayer wanted to make use of all of his income to pay the non-deductible mortgage as fast as he could... He didn't intend to subsidize the investment loan with the salary of his employees to pay for the interest that was not paid. Instead, he wanted to capitalize the interest accruing on the credit line of investment and let it accrue, taking advantage of the extra cash flow that he was now required to make additional payments to the home loan. Additionally, he wanted to use this line to cover any incidental charges for maintenance, fees, and like incurred by an investment home. This enabled him to make additional payments to the home loan, and, as a result, the loan was expected to be repaid in total over 10 years rather than the standard 30. In this situation, the ATO believed that the compounding interest was tax-deductible in the first instance, and part IVA was deemed not to be applicable to prevent that deduction. Maurice Roussety
In September 2008, the ATO issued a Draft Taxation Determination that addresses the following issue: "Is the deductibility of compound interest determined based on the same rules as deductibility for another interest?" This issue has been raised because since Hart vs. The Commissioner of Taxation 2002, the ATO has not been clear regarding how compounding interests are determined. Hill J in the Federal Court determined that two tests were proposed:
1. The reason for the borrowing
2. The purpose for the funds borrowed.
Hill J thought that "Generally, when interest is borrowed to fund the purchase of an income-producing asset, it doesn't matter the formula used."
Maurice Roussety in the Draft Determination, the Commissioner accepts that the rules governing compounds interest deductibility are similar to those that govern the deduction for ordinary interest. "The Commissioner recognizes it is the law that has been enacted following the Full Federal Court 's decision in Hart."
Investors with a home loan that wants to buy an investment property should make sure that any loan he takes out includes a capitalizing line of credit for investment. Many lenders offer this kind of service, but they are on the market.
Comments
Post a Comment